top of page

4 Scenes, 3 Characters, 2 Artforms and 1 Trauma: Generating Awareness on the Invisible Practices and Work Ethics in Street Dance and Theatre in Hong Kong

Ching Chu

 

Ching reads Isaac Ouro-Gnao’s The Commodification of Trauma in Hip Hop Theatre

An internal self conversation ensues…


 

Characters:

 

Egoist Ching (E)
Self-interested, believes in the artist’s halo and prioritises her own artistic pursuits and convenience.

 

Idealist Ching (I)
Sees things in idealistic ways, wants to see everybody happy at work and is intolerant of injustice in the workspace.


Representative Ching (R)
Tries to find the balance point between two extremes whilst working out a realistic and ethical work practice.

Scene 1: Trauma and the Hong Kong Performing Arts Context

Idealist Ching (I): WOW!! When Isaac mentioned that in the creative process of Father Figurine, where his deeply personal text was used as the driver of the performance, it felt like reliving trauma each time he was rehearsing I immediately associated the same issues of commodifying trauma dotted throughout the theatre and performance making scenes in Hong Kong. This commodification of trauma is also a commodication of vulnerability and we commonly see trauma or vulnerability being used in Hong Kong as the content or theme for creation. It is now almost standard practice for creators to probe into performers’ vulnerabilities to generate those genuine, sincere, “touching” dance pieces! 

 

Egoist Ching (E): I see only opportunities. It’s basic economy. If there’s demand, there’ll be supply. People enjoy watching emotionally and physically intense performances and if we’re utilising our vulnerability as an effective and efficient way to sell those productions, then what’s the problem with meeting demand? Even Isaac mentioned that the trauma and vulnerability contributed to his artistic success!

 

I: But doesn’t it become problematic when you’re taking advantage of others’ vulnerability or sacrificing collaborators’ wellbeing? Work ethics are not discussed openly in Hong Kong and we don’t know how to maintain a safe and comfortable creative or rehearsal process. And I’m not just talking physically, but mentally and emotionally as well!

 

E: If I have to be so considerate to everyone, then what about my own interests, considerations and needs as an artist? Using my own freedom to create what I find artistically appealing is the whole point of being an artist - I have something unique to say, which will contribute to the scenes’ development and my collaborators should follow my vision. Representative Ching, what’s your take?

 

Representative Ching (R): Ummmmmmmm…both of you have got a point…and this is exactly what I’m thinking about - how to balance an artistic pursuit and a collective ethical work practice…I’m pondering on how the commodification of vulnerability became common in the first place, especially when theatre dance and street dance are both imported art forms in Hong Kong.

 

E: Lots of art forms are imported and that’s because we didn’t have such cultural activities before. It’s social advancement. We have a funding system, there’s lots of government venues to support the performing arts and other institutions are educating generations of artists. 

 

I: A collapsing funding system! This year the government has cut a significant portion of funding for the arts! FYI it’s HK$100 billion!

 

E: At least there’s an ecosystem you can work in! Aren't you an idealist? You’re still able to follow the existing ladder to establish yourself. Get a degree, participate in different productions and learn how people do things… I’m not saying it’s easy, but there are paths you can follow to create your own work and artistic identity!

 

R: …I still feel like something’s off…

 

I: It’s true that Hong Kong has a “developed” industry, but compared to Western performing arts development, with their long history and tight social relevance, we just don’t! Performing arts was imported as a means for social stability, creating jobs and entertainment, mostly for the bourgeoisie. I see Hong Kong as a city having a history of “no history.” Normal here is to just make ends meet and the things we do are done for immediate impact. Growing up I never needed to think about what our cultural heritage is. 

R: I agree that a lot of current artistic enquiries in theatre and street dance aren’t really connected to society…it's a separate niche and out of reach…my friends (who are not in the arts) still never feel the necessity or relevance of the role that the arts plays in their life except for film and pop concerts. Government funding is the main financial support of the scene and in dance, theatre dance like ballet, Chinese dance and contemporary dance take up most of the resources, we seldom see government funded street dance productions happening. I just searched the website of Hong Kong Street Dance Development Association. The government funded the street dance theatre production The Box, which invites 4-5 local choreographers to create street dance theatre performances, it happens annually since 2018…then there’s the Flo programme that integrates a series of street dance related workshops, international field trips and work in progress showings of the performances created by the selected choreographers…

 

I: Flo only started this year! And god knows if there will be another one! When the dance and theatre industry was originally set up to increase employment and social stability, there were few thoughts about nurturing artistic growth. Producing performance falls into an industrial framework rather than encouraging diversity of art forms and criticality on artistic explorations. 

 

E: You can’t deny that vulnerability enables artists to achieve deeper emotional impacts through their physical spectacles. It’s great that we can produce shows by repeating the same working structure as it not only reinforces the existing hierarchy, but increases efficiency too.

Scene 2: Power Dynamics in the Choreographer-Dancer Hierarchy

E: Speaking of the hierarchy of positions, there’s real benefits for people who work in the industry. Isaac was given a challenging character to play in a performance that required him to stay open to his trauma. It is painful, yes, but it gave him a lot of success. A clear structure is the best way to separate our responsibilities when producing a performance. The pain of trauma was re-lived during rehearsals and performance, but it was part of his job as a performer. From the perspective of a division of labour, his job responsibilities were clear. Doesn’t that hierarchy make everyone’s work clearer and easier? It fits perfectly in the fast paced work culture here in Hong Kong too. 

 

I: One of the problems with hierarchy lies in blindly following a working structure without a clear communication of expectations from each position. In Isaac’s case, he knows about the pain and was not forced to play those characters. Often, assumptions and expectations rise to the surface only when potential conflicts emerge.

 

R: I remember a project that I participated in back in school that lasted two years, it required 7 dancers to rehearse every Monday night from 7-10pm. The choreographer would habitually run over time from 30-60 minutes and given that all of us had early morning class the next day…this lack of awareness and assumption from the choreographer who was “too into his research” and would always come up with new ideas took us for granted and expected us to work with him until late. We expected him to be mindful of our time and to take into account the workload in school that everyone had…

 

E: I totally resonate with the choreographer. Sometimes inspirations would just pop up and you’ll forget them if you don’t catch them at that moment. It’s reasonable to expect dancers involved to give it a try. After all, you were part of the performance!

 

I: The problem here wasn’t about whether the dancers were willing to cooperate with the choreographer, but whether he was aware of and respected everyone’s time and energy. When the problem was voiced, the choreographer adjusted. 

 

R: The times I was in school experiencing different large and small productions made me realise a weird and unspoken rule - apart from following choreographers artistic and performative directions, dancers had to accept and handle their emotional blasts and temperament too. 

 

I: It was common to see choreographers during rehearsals yelling with impatience! They would say: “Why can’t you do it?” or “Why haven’t you worked things out already?” when progress was not going as smoothly or as they imagined, even when students were trying to figure things out. 

 

E: Have you ever managed a team of more than 10-20 people?! The murmurs and irrelevant small talk are just way too annoying when you’re already struggling with artistic problem solving in rehearsals. The yelling, I’m sure, helps bring people’s attention back to the choreographer.

 

R: You may be right…but sometimes, there were comments I found to be unnecessary, pointing to students’ physiques as the reason and saying “you’re not flexible or strong or skillful enough…”

 

I: We can’t deny the functionality of the hierarchy of positions, but the problematic part is that people mix responsibilities and power that should (and shouldn’t) be attached to their positions…such confusion and unexamined ways of working are also being reinforced and passed on early in our education system…

 

E: When I started to learn dance 6 years ago in local dance centres, before entering academia, the choreographer-dancer hierarchy was always a universal work structure in my eyes. Without this separation of positions, we just have no other reference on how to create a performance. Can you imagine how chaotic things could turn out?


R: Something that was shared from some street dancer friends of mine about their experience of dance rehearsals and/or performance making in theatre and the street dance scene had me ruminating on what could be an effective way to set up clear work ethics. How might people work and what are the intentions and expectations towards creating a street dance piece? It can vary a lot and it depends on what context you are in…

Scene 3: Awareness, Unawareness, Ignorance or Abuse?

E: It is common practice for street dancers to follow a hierarchy when working on performance making in the Hong Kong street dance scene, no matter if it's a commercial job or studio showcase. Street dance is tightly related to the use of music and most of the time street dancers focus on the relationship between music and movement to build up their choreography. Unlike theatre dance practice, and especially in contemporary dance, there are devising performers and dancers who are required to come up with their own material to assist the creative process.

 

I: So cross-work titles are needed for crediting people’s contributions to the work!

 

E: But this blurs the line of responsibility between choreographer and dancer and that’s where things get complicated. 

 

R: Yet, my street dancer friends also shared their impressions on the differences between street dance and theatre dance. Theatre dance is more formal, with a higher cultural status and it operates with more artistic enquiries, whilst street dance is the more popular dance form and it’s seen in movies, pop concerts, television programmes and advertisements. Most street dancers of our generation started to know of and learn street dance through the Danso (slang for Dance Society) in different universities and tertiary education institutions. They usually continue dancing, learning or teaching in local studios and anyone who has studied in universities in the past 20 years must have witnessed, if not participated in Danso events.

 

E: Danso in Hong Kong universities is a big occasion for lots of people. Each of the Danso holds their Annual Performance and then there’s Mass Dance, the inter-university dance touring, and IVDC - the Inter-Versity Dance Competition held every year. All of these performances are created through the same choreographer-dancer work structure, and you know what, people celebrate their passion for dancing through these performances. Back in the day, people would rehearse intensely overnight every night until the show, despite having classes during the daytime. They are good examples and prove that hierarchy works well! The sense of community in Danso is so strong that alumni and former committee members would go back to join their Danso performances for years after they graduated!

 

I: It sounds glamorous when you’ve never actually experienced the actual Danso life. You wouldn’t know how stressful it could be - physically and mentally - in this passion hype for dancing!

 

R: The most intense rehearsal process I’ve heard about is from a street dancer friend for a dance competition. I was shocked that she was once in a competition where the co-choreographers made the whole team rehearse a 10 minute piece 11 times in a row, non-stop to practice their unison…

 

I: I would definitely see this as an abuse of power and would even challenge the choreographer's ability to teach and work in such an exploitative way!

 

R: Yes!! And even more mind-blowing was that the street dancer who told me about this experience didn’t see it as abuse… rather it’s an extreme resort to practice for perfect unison and to experience one’s own flesh and blood and build a sense of community through dancing… 

 

I: I won’t override her opinion, but if I were on that team, then lots of questions and doubts would just shoot out my mouth! How was the decision made? Were there really no better ways to refine the unison bits? Does being a dancer, either professional or amateur, mean exploiting oneself? What if dancers get injured because of fatigue? Has this already derailed them from celebrating passion, freedom and community into authority and conformity?! 

 

R: It is not hard to imagine even if you think it is exploitative, but the collective silence of 30 people could just mute your own urge to call it out…I don’t know if the choreographers were intentionally exploiting them, being unbelievably old-fashioned or using a vigorous practice to vent on the team not unable to meet “their standards”. I can’t make that judgement as I was not part of it…

 

I: Even though we may not be the first person experiencing workplace abuse, as outsiders we still hold power to encourage people to discuss what happened. It was really heart-wrenching and outrageous for me to hear that one of my dancer friends encountered year long verbal abuse and was gaslit when working for a dance company that is notorious for their questionable work ethics…my friend eventually left the company but still got really traumatised and had to get professional help to overcome the mental hardship.

 

R: It is difficult to be explicit here because again, I was not the person encountering the abuse and I have an obligation to protect my friend. From my understanding of the situation, the choreographers always disguised the verbal abuse that criticised dancers’ abilities and personal worth as pushing for their improvements…reducing their self-worth to whether they can achieve the choreographers’ requirements or not. An unnecessary harshness framed as “high standards” whilst pursuing artistic perfection. 

 

I: Shame on them. Manipulating a performer's stress to achieve those “grand goals!” There are always other ways to make things work but some people choose abuse! What do you have to say about artistic perfection at the expense of collaborators’ wellbeing Egoist Ching? 

 

E: There is no need to use verbal abuse to get the best out of people. If my dancers could not meet my standard, abusing them wouldn’t make things better. I would either put more time into constructive directions, perhaps ask the dancers to practice 11 more times in extreme cases or simply hire new dancers for the next project! 

 

I: I still find it problematic to make dancers run a piece 11 times in a row, non-stop…even YOU can see alternative ways. This is a good example of what an abuse of power can look like. It is completely unrelated to job responsibility, but rather, abusive people using their positions and titles as an excuse to justify their problematic behaviour and gaslight into tolerating and enduring abuse. We should talk more about it openly!!

Scene 4: Cliché and Flipping the Script on Cliché…

R: When I first started learning to dance, a teacher, who is now also a friend and work collaborator, asked a question that has imprinted on my mind and hugely impacted my mentality towards working in the arts. “Can rehearsals be a way of nurturing our body and mind, rather than a way of exploitation for the sparkles on stage?” As dancers, we are taught to see the moments on stage as the most important thing, even when it means you need to sacrifice yourself for the performance's sake. Injuries happen because we have to ignore the fatigue and keep pushing. Mental issues emerge because we are always asked to be tough. We are asked to discard our inner selves to meet other people’s standards and expectations. 

 

I: But if you truly love what you do, wouldn’t you want to sustain your dance life as long as possible? 

 

R: There are a lot of standardised ways of doing things that could be done differently. Referring back to Isaac’s reflections on how to inquire on trauma  - apart from commodifying it into a flattened perception of hardship - another way is to open up interpretations that can derive from it into resolutions, joy and compassion.

 

I: Sustainability is the biggest principle to live by when we talk about career development. Street dance and the performing arts cannot sever relationships from one collaboration to the next. I believe we all want to make things better for others through the arts, and because we are working with humans, we just can’t think about ourselves. I know it’s cliché but it’s only by exercising values such as respect, reciprocity, and trust that we can start to create safe spaces for healthy collaborations.

 

R: Such values are demonstrated with clear communication on expectations and responsibilities, no matter who you are in the team. We always say “be more open-minded,” but it’s easier said than done. It is a complicated mentality-action relay that requires us to be willing to step out of our patterns, be present and sensitive to situations we encounter, and to actively search for more suitable ways when working with different individuals.

 

E: The logic is simple. Setting clear responsibilities for each role is the first step to avoid any misunderstanding. To work things out requires us to be introspective and clear on our intentions and to evaluate if it is necessary to do certain things. For example, lashing out at people when a rehearsal process gets stuck just creates unnecessary tension between collaborators, which doesn’t help the creative process. What about in situations where exploitation and abuse happen?

 

I: Sadly, the measures that protect people from being abused are always missed! We may not be able to detect abusive people in advance, but we can look out for the misalignment between what people say and what they do. When someone says to you they mean good to you, yet what they actually do makes you feel uncomfortable or bad or they invalidate your hard feelings, it is a red flag!

 

R: When I encounter street dancers, I can really feel their urge to expand street dance development in Hong Kong. Compared to the international scenes of dance development - no matter if it is street dance or theatre dance - our scene is often left behind. In our generation, stereotypes and projections towards each art form still exist and are hurdles for us if we want to collaborate. With the emergence of the term “street dance theatre” it is sparking continued discussions on: the power dynamics between the forms and genres, how street dance and theatre can (or cannot) integrate artistically and how it impacts the dance scene. We should also acknowledge that lots of people are contributing their invisible effort to the industry. Sometimes I feel frustrated and not able to talk about work ethics as the norm tends to be that we don’t address the elephant in the room. Most of my experience lies in the field next to street dance, but with each rumination it helps me to become clearer that creating a better work environment for the whole performing arts scene is a crucial topic. We should all be raising an awareness on this not-so-glamorous side of the industry because the details that are invisible off stage have a huge impact on it. 

 

I: We need to keep talking and discussing when these issues emerge. Awareness needs to continue and changes can happen, but as street dance theatre is still in its bud stage, it really depends on this first generation of Hong Kong creators to stay sensitive, reject toxic work practices and set up a healthy work practice for themselves and the next generation.

Buy a copy of Ink Cypher - In Print, an exquisitely designed, limited edition, Hip Hop dance newspaper featuring all of the texts from Ink Cypher Round 1-3 here.

This text was conceived during the Hip Hop Dance Writing Laboratory in Hong Kong in April 2025. It is part of Ink Cypher Round 4, published November 2025.

 

A response to The Commodification of Trauma in Hip Hop Theatre by Isaac Ouro-Gnao.

If you value the work we're doing and are able to contribute, then please donate.

Ching Chu

Ching Chu, an interdisciplinary dance artist based in Hong Kong. Roaming from visual to performing arts, she aims for interdisciplinary performative and creative collaborations, research and teaching. She is currently taking a deconstructive approach to reflect on her performative training and developing artistic practice in relation to score-based choreography, performance generating system, female body and subjectivity.

www.chuchinching.com 


This text is part of Ink Cypher Round 4 and is published in English and Chinese.  

中文翻譯按此 - Chinese version, click here

Original translation: ChatGPT
Additional translation and edited: Catherine Yau

Copy of artistprotrait_chingchu.jpg

Ching Chu

bottom of page